1
IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL COURT
FOR GR.BOMBAY
BAIL APPLICATION NO.49 OF 2016
IN
ACB CR NO.41 OF 2016
Anil Babaji Karangutkar
Age: 57 years, Occ: Service
Residing at B/4, Rajshri Society,
Bhoir Nagar, Mulund(E), Mumbai.

..Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
(At the instance of ACB, Mumbai
Division, Mumbai)
..Respondent
Ld. advocate Mr. Tamboli for the applicant
Ld. APP Mr.Lade for the State.
CORAM: HIS HONOUR THE SPECIAL JUDGE
SHRI S.V.RANPISE(CR NO.17)
DATE: 01/07/2016
Application for bail
ORAL ORDER
1.

Present application is filed by the applicant u/s. 439 of
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for bail in CR No.41 of 2016
registered with A.C.B. Mumbai in Remand Application No.42 of
2016.

2
2.

Applicant is arrested in connection with the said
offence for the offences punishable u/s. 7,13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of
The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and now he is in judicial
custody and therefore he has filed this application on the following
grounds:н
GROUNDS
That he has not committed any offence as alleged,
he is permanent resident of Mulund, Mumbai,
he has his family to look after, he is a public servant,
he has no criminal antecedents, he is ready and willing
to abide by any conditions imposed by the Court etc.,.
3.

State has filed say and raised objection to allow this
application.
4.

Following points arise for my determination.
POINTS
5.

1.

Is applicant entitled for bail as sought for?

2.

What order?

My findings thereon with reasons thereto are as
follows:н
FINDINGS
1.

In the affirmative.

2.

As per final order.

3
REASONS
6.

Heard Ld. Advocate Mr.Tamboli for the applicant and
Ld. APP Mr.Lade for the State. Also heard investigating officer
Mr.Mayekar. Gone through the documents filed alongwith this
application.
Point No.1
7.

Though State has raised objection, but, from the
submissions it is gathered that custodial interrogation is over.
Moreover, applicant is a public servant and he has shown his ready
and willingness to abide by any conditions imposed by the Court.
So also he had challenged the offences levelled against him.
Considering the same and when investigating officer has frankly
submitted to impose conditions, I hold that it would be proper to
consider the relief as sought for by imposing stringent conditions.
Hence, I answer point No.1 in the affirmative and proceed to
pass the following order:н
ORDER
1.

Application is allowed.

2.

Applicant be enlarged on Bail on executing
P.R.Bond of Rs.15,000/н (Rs.fifteen thousand only)
and solvent surety in the like amount subject to the
conditions that
(i).

Applicant should remain present before the
investigating officer at ACB office, Mumbai
on every Wednesday and Friday in between
10.00 am and 2.00 pm till filing of the
chargesheet immediately after his release on
bail.

4
(ii).

Applicant should not pressurise
the witnesses and tamper with the
evidence.

(iii). Applicant should not leave Mumbai
and Thane without prior permission
of the Court.

01/07/2016.

S.V.RANPISE
SPECIAL JUDGE,
UNDER P.C. ACT
GR.MUMBAI.

”
I affirm that the contents of this PDF file judgment are the
same, word to word, as per the original judgment.”
Mrs.T.C.Kamble(HG Stenographer)
HHJ Shri S.V.RANPISE (CR 17)
Date of pronouncement of judgment :1/7/16
Judgment signed on: 1/7/16
Judgment uploaded on: 19/7/16
5
Ex.2
Application filed by accused for cash
Security.
Court passed order below Ex.2 :н
ORDER
Perused the application and say filed by A.P.P.
Heard both sides. Considering the difficulty
of obtaining immediate solvency, application is
allowed.
Applicant is allowed to submit provisionally
cash security of Rs.15,000/н for the period of
four weeks.
Registrar(S) is directed to accept the cash
after office hours.

01/07/2016.

S.V.RANPISE
SPECIAL JUDGE.

6
07/06/2016.

S.V.RANPISE
SPECIAL JUDGE,
UNDER P.C.ACT
MUMBAI.

7
Ex.4
Application filed by adv. Mr.Salunkhe for cash
Security.
Court passed order below Ex.4:н
ORDER
Perused the application.
Say filed by A.P.P.
Heard Adv.Mr.Salunkhe.
Application is allowed.
Applicant is allowed to submit provisionally
cash security of Rs.15,000/н for the period of
four weeks.
Registrar(S) is directed to accept the cash
after office hours.

06/06/2016.

S.V.RANPISE
SPECIAL JUDGE.

8
”
I affirm that the contents of this PDF file judgment are the
same, word to word, as per the original judgment.”
Mrs.T.C.Kamble(HG Stenographer)
HHJ Shri S.V.RANPISE (CR 17)
Date of pronouncement of judgment :22/2/16
Judgment signed on: 22/2/16
Judgment uploaded on: 10/3/16
9
”
I affirm that the contents of this PDF file judgment are the
same, word to word, as per the original judgment.”
Mrs.T.C.Kamble(HG Stenographer)
HHJ Shri S.V.RANPISE (CR 17)
Date of pronouncement of judgment :5/2/16
Judgment signed on: 5/2/16
Judgment uploaded on: 9/2/16
BA 76/2015
Ld. Advocate Mrs.Barge for the applicants
Ld. Advocate Mr.Lade for the State
F.R.S.R. the following order is passed:ORDER
10
1.

Application is allowed.

2.

Applicant be enlarged on Bail on executing
P.R.Bond of Rs.15,000/н with one solvent surety
in the like amount, subject to the conditions that
Applicant should attend concerned A.C.B. Office
on every Thursday in between 10.00 a.m. to
12.00 noon and should not leave Mumbai
and Navi Mumbai without prior permission of
Court till filing of the chargeнsheet and should
not pressurize the witnesses and tamper with the
evidence.

Ex.2
Application filed by adv. Mrs.Barge for cash
Security.
Court passed order below Ex.2:н
ORDER
Perused the application. Heard Adv.Mrs.Barge
Say filed by A.P.P.
Application is allowed.
Applicant is allowed to submit provisionally
cash security of Rs.15,000/н for the period of
four weeks.
Registrar(S) is directed to accept the cash
after office hours.
Spl. Judge
10/12/2015.

SPL.JUDGE.

11
”
I affirm that the contents of this PDF file
judgment are the same, word to word, as per the original
judgment.”
Mrs.T.C.Kamble(HG Stenographer)
HHJ Shri S.V.RANPISE (CR 17)
Date of pronouncement of judgment :
Judgment signed on: 10/12/15
Judgment uploaded on: 10/12/15
10/12/15