1
IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL JUDGE FOR GR. BOMBAY AT BOMBAY
BAIL APPLICATION NO.27 OF 2016
IN
REMAND APPLCIATION NO.21 OF 2016
IN
C.R.NO. 13 OF 2016
Uttam Ramchandra Shinde
Age about 49 years,
Residing at Siddharth Residency
Flat No.Cн404, Lokhande Marg
Chembur, Mumbaiн400 089.

)
)
)
)
).. Applicant/accused.

V/s.
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
(at the instance of A.C.B., Mumbai
C.R.No.17/2016.

)
)
)..Respondent.

Advocates Mr. S.D. Gaikwad the applicant/accused.
A.P.P. Mr. Sanjay Soshte for the State.
CORAM; HIS HONOUR THE ADDL.SESSIONS
JUDGE SHRI ATUL M. KURHEKAR.
(C.R.No.46)
st
DATE: 21 MARCH, 2016.
ORDER
This is an application for bail filed by the accused in Crime
No.17 of 2016 for the offences punishable under sections 7, and 13(1)(d)
r/w 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act.

2
2
Heard the the advocate for the accused and learned A.P.P. for
the State and the investigating officer. Perused papers.
3
It is contended by the accused that he has been falsely
implicated in the crime. It is pointed out by the advocate for the accused
that the investigation is almost completed. He has permanent abode in
Mumbai. The applicant is also ready to coнoperate with the investigating
agency. Hence, this application. He has permanent abode in Mumbai. The
applicant is also ready to coнoperate with the investigating agency and
ready to abide by conditions, if any imposed, while granting bail.
4
The learned A.P.P.. has filed reply and opposed the application
on the ground that the accused may tamper with the prosecution evidence
and may pressurize the witnesses, as the investigation is still in progress.
5
Today, the accused has been taken in the judicial custody. The
case paper reveals that the cash has already been seized. The voice sample
of the accused has also been taken. As far as further investigation is
concerned, the presence of accused can be secured for this purposes by
putting certain conditions. I do not find any fruitful purpose will serve by
eeping the accused in judicial custody. In this circumstances, I find it
proper to release the accused on bail on following conditions. Hence, the
order:н
ORDER
The Bail Application No.27 of 2016 is hereby allowed.

3
2
The applicant/accused Uttam Ramchandra Shinde be released
on bail, on furnishing P.R. bond of Rs.25,000/н (Rupees twenty five
thousand only) with one or more solvent sureties in the like amount on
following conditions:
3
The accused shall attend the ACB Office on every Monday and
Wednesday between 11.00 a.m. to 1.00 p.m. till filing of the chargeнsheet.
4
The accused shall not tamper the prosecution witnesses and
evidence in any manner whatsoever.
5
Four weeks time is granted to accused to furnish surety and in
the meantime, he is directed to deposit cash of Rs.25,000/н today.
6
The office to accept the cash after office hours.

7
Bail Application No.27 of 2016 stands disposed of accordingly.
(A.M. KURHEKAR)
Special Judge for ACB
Greater Mumbai.

21.03.2016
Dictated on :
21.03.2016
Transcribed on: 04.04.2016
Signed by HHJ on:04.04.2016
Pdf
УI affirm that the contents of this PDF file judgment are
the same, word to word, as per the original judgment.Ф
Name of Steno with post
:н Mrs. S.S. Pawar (H.G.)

Name of the Judge
(Court Room No.)

:нHis Honour the Additional Sessions Judge
Shri A.M.Kurhekar (C.R.No.46).

Date of pronouncement of
judgment:н
: 21.03.2016
Judgment signed by the P.O. On: 04.04.2016
Judgment uploaded on
: 12.04.2016
4
УI affirm that the contents of this PDF file judgment are
the same, word to word, as per the original judgment.Ф
Name of Steno with post
:н Mrs. S.S. Pawar (H.G.)
Name of the Judge
:н His Honour the Additional Sessions Judge
(Court Room No.)
Shri A.M.Kurhekar (C.R.No.46).
Date of pronouncement of
judgment:н
: 01.03.2016
Judgment signed by the P.O. On: 14.03.2016
Judgment uploaded on
: 04.04.2016